Immunity

In conventional language, "immunity" is seen as the body's ability to recognize and respond to pathogens.

However, true "immunity" simply means that an individual is not bothered and reactive, and does not become a "victim" of events and experiences in their life. As a result, when they experience evolutionary desires and then form DHSs and biological conflicts to initiate special biological programs in order to attain those evolutionary desires, they simply move through the entire special biological program very quickly and do not accumulate significant conflict mass that will result in significant healing-phase symptoms after conflict resolution.

In reality, conflicts are not "events" that "happen to" an organism. Therefore, there is nothing to be immune to. The idea of "immunity" is a type of self-devaluation story that positions the individual as a victim, vulnerable to the experiences of its own existence. This is a completely nonsensical term in the context of the individual's evolution.

Practically speaking, "immunity" is a result of having a DHS, creating a biological conflict in the psyche, resolving the conflict, and completing the entire healing phase, including recognizing the epi-crisis for what it is and once again resolving the conflict before moving on to a new, evolved normotonia.

An organism is "immune" to a particular type of DHS when that individual now has an awareness and understanding so that it no longer interprets a circumstance, sensory cue, or social meaning as serious, unexpected, and proof of isolation from life source. In other words, no DHS occurs, no biological conflict forms, and no special biological program is initiated.

Of course, the number of ways that one can be caught off guard and feel a momentary concern about existential isolation is unlimited, and will always occur whenever there is a significant evolutionary desire (desire for a change of state) within the individual's consciousness. So the goal is not to become "immune" to conflicts or DHSs, which is impossible and will lead to myriad self-devaluation conflicts in the attempt. The goal is to embrace the special biological program as an opportunity to evolve.

True "immunity," therefore, is a zest for experience, a willingness to go through difficult experiences in order to expand oneself. It is a state of high self-confidence and trust in life.

This kind of immunity develops (or, rather, expands) each time an organism truly resolves a biological conflict and completes the full SBS through PCL B. Biologically, we would say that the organism that has established a new normotonia is "more adapted" in relation to the conflict content than it was before.

Tracks show the opposite of "immunity." When a sensory cue associated with an earlier DHS reactivates the conflict, that means that the organism has not really attained immunity because it has not really gone through the entire SBS to the completion of PCL B. Tracks are the basis of allergies, sensitivities, repetitive symptoms, and many chronic patterns.

Thinking in terms of so-called "herd immunity," we are simply talking about shared meaning-making across a group because of shared beliefs and shared reactivity. But this is actually herd mentality, and the individual will be just as prone as everyone else in the herd to any new evolutionary advance.

This means that "herd immunity" is even less real than biological immunity, and true immunity means following one's own evolutionary journey without entering the shared meaning-making or herd mentality that results in similar DHSs across a group.

The key question always comes back not simply to "what circumstance occurred," but to "what circumstance am I interpreting as proof of isolation from life source?"